Loading company financials…
TORONTO STOCK EXCHANGE · Metals & Mining · CIK 0001203464
$16.42
-7.86% · live
Updated
$9.71B market value
From IAMGOLD CORP's FY2025 40-F, filed Feb 18, 2026 · read the filing
IAMGOLD mines metal ores. It took in $2.85B last year, which makes it a mid-sized company. Of every dollar it sells, about 26 cents is left as profit.
The financial picture is led by profitability, growth and debt.
A conclusion from the filings, not a recommendation. Detailed figures and supporting evidence appear in their dedicated sections below.
Financial health
Strong finances across the board.
From IAMGOLD CORP's FY2025 annual filing · share price scored separately
Largest year-over-year changes in FY2025
Revenue
$1.63B → $2.85B
Gross profit
$549.9M → $1.21B
Gross margin
33.7% → 42.3%
Operating margin
57.8% → 38.3%
Measured against FY2024, from the 40-F filed Feb 18, 2026
Improved: +74.7%
$1.63B to $2.85BCritical
Why it matters: Sales are what everything else is built on. A fall can be lost customers, lower prices, or a business the company sold — the filing itself says which.
How the latest move compares (quote live), and what was published around it
IAG fell 7.86% on the latest quote. The average Materials company tracked here moved −1.02%, and the S&P 500 −1.04%. That is 6.8 points below its sector and 6.8 points below the market.
Expectations
Not from the filings — what other people are betting on, and what the price already assumes.
The growth rate someone buying today is paying for, against what the company has delivered
At today's price, the market is paying for free cash flow to shrink by about 2% a year for the next 10 years. Over the last 9 years it grew by about 40% a year.
The essentials
Each answered from the filings, with the numbers behind it.
Yes. It keeps about 26 cents of every dollar of sales as profit, earning $732.3M last year.
Yes, quickly. Sales grew 74.7% last year.
No. Its borrowings would take under a year of cash flow to clear. For every $1 it owes, it owns $3.64 in assets.
Core operating and valuation reference metrics
Whether the dividend is covered by what the business actually earns
It pays out 18 cents of every dollar of profit and keeps the rest, which leaves the payment comfortably covered. It paid out 11% of the cash its operations generated. It has paid in each of the last 4 years.
GoodFigures from the FY2025 annual filing
Last year it earned $732.3M and generated $1.14B of cash from operations.
Reported annual figures
As reported to the SEC, in USD. Hover or show sources to see where each figure came from.
| Income statement | FY202540-F · Feb 18, 2026Filing for FY2025 | FY202440-F · Mar 21, 2025Filing for FY2024 | FY202340-F · Mar 21, 2025Filing for FY2023 | FY202240-F · Mar 15, 2024Filing for FY2022 | FY202140-F · Mar 28, 2023Filing for FY2021 | ChangeFY2025 vs FY2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueWhat is this? | $2.85B | $1.63B | $987.1M | $958.8M | $875.5M | +74.7% |
| Cost of revenue | $1.65B | $1.08B | $863.0M | $810.9M | $813.3M | +52.0% |
| Gross profit | $1.21B | $549.9M | $124.1M | $147.9M | $62.2M | +119.3% |
| Gross marginGross profit ÷ revenueWhat is this? | 42.3% | 33.7% | 12.6% | 15.4% | 7.1% | +8.6 pts |
| Selling, general and administrative | $58.4M | $48.9M | $50.8M | $52.0M | $38.8M | +19.4% |
| Operating income | $1.09B | $944.0M | -$300.0K | $41.3M | -$104.6M | +15.8% |
| Operating marginOperating income ÷ revenueWhat is this? | 38.3% | 57.8% | -0.0% | 4.3% | -11.9% | −19.5 pts |
| Interest expense | $110.2M | $95.9M | $79.0M | $38.9M | $0.00 | +14.9% |
| Income before tax | $969.8M | $977.2M | $128.2M | $41.7M | -$54.5M | −0.8% |
| Net income | $732.3M | $847.8M | $103.8M | -$52.8M | -$255.1M | −13.6% |
| Net marginNet income ÷ revenueWhat is this? | 25.7% | 51.9% | 10.5% | -5.5% | -29.1% | −26.2 pts |
| Earnings per shareNet income ÷ shares outstanding at the period end — close to, but not the same as, the reported EPSWhat is this? | $1.24 | $1.48 | $0.2157 | $-0.1102 | $-0.5348 | −16.5% |
† calculated from other reported figures, such as total liabilities as assets minus equity.
Insider activity, ownership stakes and what's coming — straight from EDGAR, before any article is written about it
Nothing recent
No insider trades, pending-sale notices or 5% stake filings from IAG in the last few months. That is the ordinary case, not a gap.
Not investment advice, and not a signal to act on by itself — a filing says what happened, not why, and insiders trade for ordinary reasons having nothing to do with where they think the company is headed.
20 recent filings, newest first. Each is labelled from its form and item numbers, not from its wording.
Report filed on Form 6-K
Read the filingReport filed on Form 6-K
Read the filingWrite down why you are following IAMGOLD CORP, what has to go right and what would change your mind, then see each new annual report measured against it. Sign in to start one.
Go deeper
Every figure above traces back to a filing in the timeline, each linked to the document itself.
Coverage from the last 30 days
Auriginal Reports Updated NI 43-101 Mineral Resource Estimate at Roger: Nearly 1.40 Million Ounces of Gold Inferred at 0.54 g/t Gold - Zone Open to Resource Expansion
Yahoo ·
IAMGOLD Provides Update on Côté Gold Mine Operations Ahead of Mine Tour
Yahoo ·
Iamgold: A Stronger H2 On Deck At Cote
SeekingAlpha ·
IAMGOLD (TSX:IMG) Stock Could Still Be Cheap Despite Its 7x Run
Yahoo ·
Here’s How Much You Would Have Made Owning Iamgold Stock In The Last 5 Years
Every company's figures are checked for internal consistency: the balance sheet adding up, figures sharing one currency, cash flow and share counts within plausible ranges, and how recent the latest annual report is. Nothing here changes a figure.
Financial figures are from IAG's 40-F for fiscal year 2025 (period ending 2025-12-31, filed Feb 18, 2026), reported under the IFRS taxonomy. View the source filing.
3 of 4 scored areas had enough reported figures to judge
The score averages profitability, growth, debt and accounting. Accounting had too few reported figures and is left out of the average rather than counted as a weakness, so a company is never marked down for a figure it did not publish. Cash generation is shown for context and already feeds profitability. Valuation is scored separately, because a share price says nothing about whether the business is sound. 9 of the 9 Piotroski checks could be evaluated. How the score works
Each year scored only from its annual report as it was first filed
| Fiscal year | Health | F-Score | Scored from |
|---|---|---|---|
| FY2025 | 10.0 | 7/9 | 40-F, filed Feb 18, 2026 |
| FY2024 | 8.7 | 6/9 | 40-F, filed Mar 21, 2025 |
| FY2023 | 4.7 | 7/9 | 40-F, filed Mar 15, 2024 |
| FY2022 | 6.0 | 6/9 | 40-F, filed Mar 28, 2023 |
| FY2021 | 2.0 | 3/9 | 40-F, filed Feb 24, 2022 |
| FY2020 | 8.7 | 7/9 | 40-F, filed Feb 18, 2021 |
A later restatement never reaches back into an earlier year, and every year is scored without a share price, so the latest point can differ a little from the headline score, which uses today's price.
Every check behind the three models, and what each one tests
7 of 9 checks passed
Nine yes-or-no tests of whether this year's finances improved on last year's.
4.95
In the safe zone
For this model, above 2.6 is safe and below 1.1 is distress.
Distance from bankruptcy, from a model fitted on companies that did and did not go bust. It describes a balance sheet's shape today; it does not forecast a failure.
not reported — This company has not reported enough of the required figures to calculate this score.
This company has not reported enough of the required figures to calculate this score.
Screens eight accounting ratios for the pattern earnings manipulators tend to leave. A flag is a reason to read the filing closely, never evidence of wrongdoing.
Every figure above comes from the FY2025 filing as filed with the SEC.
Improved: +119.3%
$549.9M to $1.21BCritical
Why it matters: What is left of sales after the direct cost of producing them. It normally moves with revenue, so a move out of step with revenue is the part worth noticing.
Improved: +8.6 pts
33.7% to 42.3%Critical
Why it matters: What survives each sale before overheads. Falling gross margin usually means the company is discounting or its input costs rose — it is the earliest place pricing pressure shows.
Deteriorated: −19.5 pts
57.8% to 38.3%Critical
Why it matters: What survives each sale after running the business. A falling operating margin beside a steady gross margin points at overheads — wages, marketing, research — rather than pricing.
Deteriorated: −26.3 pts
51.9% to 25.7%Critical
Why it matters: What survives to the very end of each sale. Worth reading beside revenue: growing sales on a shrinking margin means the company is buying its growth.
Improved: turned positive
-$72.6M to $849.1MCritical
Why it matters: Cash left after paying for the plant that produced it — the money genuinely available for dividends, buybacks or paying down debt. Harder to flatter than profit.
Changed: +612.8%
$18.0M to $128.3MCritical
Why it matters: Cash handed to shareholders. A rise can be a higher dividend or simply more shares, and a cut is a decision the company explains in its own filing — neither is rated here.
Changed: -47.5%
$558.6M to $293.5MCritical
Why it matters: Neither good nor bad on its own. Heavy spending is a company building capacity or a company struggling to stand still, and the two look identical in this figure.
Improved: +15.8%
$944.0M to $1.09BSignificant
Why it matters: Profit from running the business, before interest and tax. Less exposed than profit to one-off financing and tax items, so a clearer read on the business itself.
Deteriorated: -16.5%
$1.48 to $1.24Significant
Why it matters: Profit divided by the shares in issue at the period end, so it sits close to but not on the company's own reported figure. It can rise with no growth in profit when the company buys back stock — read it beside the share count.
Improved: -36.9%
$1.03B to $648.8MSignificant
Why it matters: Rising debt is not automatically bad — borrowing to build something that earns more than the interest is ordinary. It matters when it grows faster than the profit meant to service it.
Improved: +21.4%
$347.5M to $421.9MSignificant
Why it matters: A falling cash pile is only a warning if the company is consuming it. Paying down debt, buying back stock and paying a dividend all reduce cash by choice.
Deteriorated: -13.6%
$847.8M to $732.3MNotable
Why it matters: Profit swings far more than sales do, and one-off items — a legal settlement, a tax charge, an asset sale — move it without the underlying business changing.
Deteriorated: +3.5%
571.4M to 591.1MNotable
Why it matters: New shares divide the same company into more pieces, so each existing holding owns slightly less of it. Often pay for staff or an acquisition rather than anything wrong.
Figures compare the two most recent annual filings — read the latest one. Moves are graded on fixed lines — 5%, 15% and 40% for amounts, and 1, 3 and 8 points for margins — as notable, significant or critical. Nothing here reads the management commentary, which is where a company explains its own numbers.
These coincide with the move in time. None is presented as its cause: a price can move on news that names no company, on the wider market, or on trading that no document records.
Filter by minute, hour, day or week — or compare against peers
Loading price history…
Discounted at 8%–10% a year, with growth settling to 2.5% after 10 years. Those rates are ordinary choices, not measurements: across that range the assumed growth works out between -4% and 0%. This describes what the price implies — it is not a forecast, and not a view on whether the price is right.
Opinions from 14 analysts covering this company, as of . Their views, not this site's.
Of 14 analysts publishing on this company, 2 say strong buy, 9 say buy and 3 say hold. Analysts are paid to publish a view and are wrong often; the split above says how much they agree with each other, which is the part a single headline rating hides.
Published by Finnhub. Analyst coverage skews towards larger companies and towards optimism — sell ratings are rare across the whole market, so a company with none is ordinary rather than endorsed.
Measured on and published about a week later — this is a fortnightly snapshot, not a live position.
About 1.9% of this company's shares have been borrowed and sold by people expecting to buy them back cheaper. That is a bet the price falls. Those people can be wrong, and when a heavily shorted share rises they have to buy it back, which pushes it up further.
Collected by FINRA from broker-dealers twice a month. It counts positions, not intentions, and some of it is hedging rather than a directional bet against the company.
Nothing in this section is a figure this company reported about itself. These are expectations and positions — what the price implies, what analysts have published, what short sellers are betting, and what large funds held at the last count. WylthIQ reports them; it does not endorse them, does not forecast prices, and takes no view on whether any of them will turn out to be right.
The trailing P/E is 13.3x — investors pay $13.3 for each $1 of trailing profit.
This company has not reported enough of the required figures to calculate this score.
Report filed on Form 6-K
Report filed on Form 6-K
Read the filingReport filed on Form 6-K
Read the filingReport filed on Form 6-K
Read the filingReport filed on Form 6-K
Read the filingReport filed on Form 6-K
Read the filingReport filed on Form 6-K
Read the filingReport filed on Form 6-K
Read the filingReport filed on Form 6-K
Read the filingReport filed on Form 6-K
Read the filingReport filed on Form 6-K
Read the filingReport filed on Form 6-K
Read the filingReport filed on Form 6-K
Read the filingReport filed on Form 6-K
Read the filingReport filed on Form 6-K
Read the filingReport filed on Form 6-K
Read the filingReport filed on Form 6-K
Read the filingReport filed on Form 6-K
Read the filingBenzinga ·
Primary sources and further research