How comparing works here
How do I compare two companies?
Type the tickers into the box above — up to five at once. Every row is read from the companies' own annual filings, so a comparison shows the same measure computed the same way for each of them rather than whatever each company chose to highlight.
Can I compare an ETF with a stock?
Yes, and the table changes to suit. Two funds are compared on cost, income, spread and record, because revenue growth and debt mean nothing for a fund. A fund against a company shows only what both of them have.
Side by side
Compare
Put up to 4 companies, funds, commodities or coins next to each other — health, valuation, growth and performance.
Every row is computed the same way for every column, from each company's own annual filing, so a comparison is not a collection of whichever figures each of them chose to put in a press release. Funds are compared on what a fund is actually judged on: cost, income, spread and record.
Relative performance
Rebased so every symbol starts at 0%
Loading price history…
Side by side
Latest annual figures from each company's filings
| Metric | WULFTERAWULF INC. | SAILSailPoint, Inc. | AURAurora Innovation, Inc. | PCORPROCORE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. | Median of the restexcluding WULF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Company | Company | Company | Company | |
| Price | $11.35▲ 0.03 (0.27%) | $20.06▲ 0.38 (1.93%) | $5.01▲ 0.00 (0.00%) | $62.29▲ 1.38 (2.27%) | |
| Health scoreComposite of profitability, growth, debt and accounting quality. | 4.7/10 | 6.0/10 | 6.0/10 | 3.3/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Market value | $4.77B | $11.31B | $9.73B | $9.45B | |
| Revenue | $168.5M | $1.07B | $3.0M | $1.32B | |
| Profit | -$661.4M | -$270.1M | -$816.0M | -$100.8M | |
| Revenue growthChange in sales versus the prior year. | 20.3% | 24.4% | — | 14.8% | 19.6% |
| Gross marginShare of sales left after the direct cost of producing them. | 39.2% | 64.5% | -466.7% | 79.5% | 64.5% |
| Operating marginShare of sales left after running the business, before interest and tax. | -110.5% | -28.7% | -30033.3% | -9.4% | -28.7% |
| Profit marginProfit kept from each dollar of sales. | -392.6% | -25.2% | -27200.0% | -7.6% | -25.2% |
| Free cash flow marginCash left after capital spending, as a share of sales. | -702.5% | 6.0% | -20400.0% | 21.3% | 6.0% |
| Return on equityProfit against the owners' stake in the company. | -470.9% | -3.9% | -38.1% | -8.0% | -8.0% |
| Return on invested capital (approx.)Operating profit after tax against equity plus debt, less cash. Cash here excludes short-term investments, so this runs low for cash-rich companies. | — | -3.7% | -37.1% | -12.6% | -12.6% |
| P/E ratioPrice paid per dollar of annual profit. | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA (approx.)Market value plus debt less cash, against operating profit before depreciation. Cash excludes short-term investments, so this runs high for cash-rich companies. | — | — | — | — | — |
| Price to book | 33.95x | 1.65x | 4.55x | 7.49x | 4.55x |
| Debt to equityTotal liabilities compared with owners' stake. | 45.70x | 0.11x | 0.09x | 0.77x | 0.11x |
| Piotroski F-ScoreNine checks of financial strength. Higher is stronger. | 1/9 | 6/9 | 2/7 | 5/8 | 5.0 |
| Bankruptcy riskAltman Z-Score zone. | n/a for banks | safe | safe | distress |
How WULF compares with the others
- WULF's operating margin of -110.5% is lower than the median of the other companies selected (-28.7%).
- Its revenue growth of 20.3% is in line with the median of the other companies selected (19.6%).
- Its liabilities are higher relative to equity than the median of the other companies selected: 45.7x against 0.1x.
Measured against the other companies entered, from each one's latest annual filing. A difference describes the companies; it does not rank them.