How comparing works here
How do I compare two companies?
Type the tickers into the box above — up to five at once. Every row is read from the companies' own annual filings, so a comparison shows the same measure computed the same way for each of them rather than whatever each company chose to highlight.
Can I compare an ETF with a stock?
Yes, and the table changes to suit. Two funds are compared on cost, income, spread and record, because revenue growth and debt mean nothing for a fund. A fund against a company shows only what both of them have.
Side by side
Compare
Put up to 4 companies, funds, commodities or coins next to each other — health, valuation, growth and performance.
Every row is computed the same way for every column, from each company's own annual filing, so a comparison is not a collection of whichever figures each of them chose to put in a press release. Funds are compared on what a fund is actually judged on: cost, income, spread and record.
Relative performance
Rebased so every symbol starts at 0%
Loading price history…
Side by side
Latest annual figures from each company's filings
| Metric | PATHUiPath, Inc. | GENGen Digital Inc. | FROGJFrog Ltd | GTLBGitlab Inc. | Median of the restexcluding PATH |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Company | Company | Company | Company | |
| Price | $13.71▲ 0.28 (2.08%) | $24.89▲ 0.77 (3.19%) | $93.89▼ 2.41 (2.50%) | $54.53▼ 0.92 (1.66%) | |
| Health scoreComposite of profitability, growth, debt and accounting quality. | 8.7/10 | 7.3/10 | 7.3/10 | 7.3/10 | 7.3/10 |
| Market value | $7.38B | $14.88B | $11.23B | $9.10B | |
| Revenue | $1.61B | $5.00B | $531.8M | $955.2M | |
| Profit | $282.3M | $973.0M | -$71.8M | -$56.0M | |
| Revenue growthChange in sales versus the prior year. | 12.7% | 27.1% | 24.1% | 25.8% | 25.8% |
| Gross marginShare of sales left after the direct cost of producing them. | 83.2% | 78.5% | 76.8% | 87.4% | 78.5% |
| Operating marginShare of sales left after running the business, before interest and tax. | 3.5% | 42.4% | -17.3% | -7.4% | -7.4% |
| Profit marginProfit kept from each dollar of sales. | 17.5% | 19.5% | -13.5% | -5.9% | -5.9% |
| Free cash flow marginCash left after capital spending, as a share of sales. | 21.9% | 30.5% | 26.8% | 23.2% | 26.8% |
| Return on equityProfit against the owners' stake in the company. | 13.6% | 37.3% | -8.1% | -5.6% | -5.6% |
| Return on invested capital (approx.)Operating profit after tax against equity plus debt, less cash. Cash here excludes short-term investments, so this runs low for cash-rich companies. | 3.7% | 13.1% | -8.9% | -7.3% | -7.3% |
| P/E ratioPrice paid per dollar of annual profit. | 26.13x | 15.30x | — | — | 15.30x |
| EV / EBITDA (approx.)Market value plus debt less cash, against operating profit before depreciation. Cash excludes short-term investments, so this runs high for cash-rich companies. | — | 8.68x | — | — | 8.68x |
| Price to book | 3.54x | 5.70x | 12.66x | 9.18x | 9.18x |
| Debt to equityTotal liabilities compared with owners' stake. | 0.53x | 4.97x | 0.51x | 0.69x | 0.69x |
| Piotroski F-ScoreNine checks of financial strength. Higher is stronger. | 7/8 | 7/9 | 4/8 | 4/8 | 4.0 |
| Bankruptcy riskAltman Z-Score zone. | safe | distress | safe | safe |
How PATH compares with the others
- PATH's operating margin of 3.5% is higher than the median of the other companies selected (-7.4%).
- Its revenue grew more slowly than the median of the other companies selected: 12.7% against 25.8%.
- It trades at a higher P/E than the other company selected: 26.1x against 15.3x.
- Its liabilities are lower relative to equity than the median of the other companies selected: 0.5x against 0.7x.
Measured against the other companies entered, from each one's latest annual filing. A difference describes the companies; it does not rank them.