How comparing works here
How do I compare two companies?
Type the tickers into the box above — up to five at once. Every row is read from the companies' own annual filings, so a comparison shows the same measure computed the same way for each of them rather than whatever each company chose to highlight.
Can I compare an ETF with a stock?
Yes, and the table changes to suit. Two funds are compared on cost, income, spread and record, because revenue growth and debt mean nothing for a fund. A fund against a company shows only what both of them have.
Side by side
Compare
Put up to 4 companies, funds, commodities or coins next to each other — health, valuation, growth and performance.
Every row is computed the same way for every column, from each company's own annual filing, so a comparison is not a collection of whichever figures each of them chose to put in a press release. Funds are compared on what a fund is actually judged on: cost, income, spread and record.
Relative performance
Rebased so every symbol starts at 0%
Loading price history…
Side by side
Latest annual figures from each company's filings
| Metric | OLNOLIN Corp | DOWDOW INC. | WLKWESTLAKE CORP | CBTCABOT CORP | Median of the restexcluding OLN |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Company | Company | Company | Company | |
| Price | $15.54▲ 0.61 (4.09%) | $31.81▲ 1.43 (4.71%) | $64.14▲ 3.30 (5.42%) | $74.33▲ 0.55 (0.75%) | |
| Health scoreComposite of profitability, growth, debt and accounting quality. | 3.3/10 | 4.0/10 | 4.0/10 | 6.0/10 | 4.0/10 |
| Market value | $1.77B | $22.39B | $8.22B | $3.93B | |
| Revenue | $6.78B | $39.97B | $11.17B | $3.71B | |
| Profit | -$101.1M | -$2.44B | -$1.51B | $331.0M | |
| Revenue growthChange in sales versus the prior year. | 3.7% | -7.0% | -8.0% | -7.0% | -7.0% |
| Gross marginShare of sales left after the direct cost of producing them. | 7.4% | 6.3% | 7.3% | 25.3% | 7.3% |
| Operating marginShare of sales left after running the business, before interest and tax. | 0.1% | — | -14.1% | 16.7% | 1.3% |
| Profit marginProfit kept from each dollar of sales. | -1.5% | -6.1% | -13.5% | 8.9% | -6.1% |
| Free cash flow marginCash left after capital spending, as a share of sales. | 3.7% | -3.6% | -4.7% | 10.5% | -3.6% |
| Return on equityProfit against the owners' stake in the company. | -5.5% | -15.3% | -17.2% | 21.4% | -15.3% |
| Return on invested capital (approx.)Operating profit after tax against equity plus debt, less cash. Cash here excludes short-term investments, so this runs low for cash-rich companies. | 0.1% | — | -10.7% | 15.1% | 2.2% |
| P/E ratioPrice paid per dollar of annual profit. | — | — | — | 11.87x | 11.87x |
| EV / EBITDA (approx.)Market value plus debt less cash, against operating profit before depreciation. Cash excludes short-term investments, so this runs high for cash-rich companies. | 8.40x | — | — | 6.18x | 6.18x |
| Price to book | 0.96x | 1.40x | 0.94x | 2.53x | 1.40x |
| Debt to equityTotal liabilities compared with owners' stake. | 2.97x | 2.66x | 1.21x | 1.46x | 1.46x |
| Piotroski F-ScoreNine checks of financial strength. Higher is stronger. | 4/9 | 4/9 | 3/9 | 6/9 | 4.0 |
| Bankruptcy riskAltman Z-Score zone. | distress | distress | distress | safe |
How OLN compares with the others
- OLN's operating margin of 0.1% is lower than the median of the other companies selected (1.3%).
- Its revenue grew faster than the median of the other companies selected: 3.7% against -7.0%.
- It has no P/E to set against theirs, because it did not make a profit.
- Its liabilities are higher relative to equity than the median of the other companies selected: 3.0x against 1.5x.
Measured against the other companies entered, from each one's latest annual filing. A difference describes the companies; it does not rank them.