How comparing works here
How do I compare two companies?
Type the tickers into the box above — up to five at once. Every row is read from the companies' own annual filings, so a comparison shows the same measure computed the same way for each of them rather than whatever each company chose to highlight.
Can I compare an ETF with a stock?
Yes, and the table changes to suit. Two funds are compared on cost, income, spread and record, because revenue growth and debt mean nothing for a fund. A fund against a company shows only what both of them have.
Side by side
Compare
Put up to 4 companies, funds, commodities or coins next to each other — health, valuation, growth and performance.
Every row is computed the same way for every column, from each company's own annual filing, so a comparison is not a collection of whichever figures each of them chose to put in a press release. Funds are compared on what a fund is actually judged on: cost, income, spread and record.
Relative performance
Rebased so every symbol starts at 0%
Loading price history…
Side by side
Latest annual figures from each company's filings
| Metric | ITGARTNER INC | IBMINTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP | CTSHCOGNIZANT TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS CORP | QNTQuantinuum Inc. | Median of the restexcluding IT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Company | Company | Company | Company | |
| Price | $234.44▲ 14.87 (6.77%) | $252.11▲ 0.65 (0.26%) | $73.72▲ 4.17 (6.00%) | $35.90▼ 2.75 (7.12%) | |
| Health scoreComposite of profitability, growth, debt and accounting quality. | 9.0/10 | 8.0/10 | 9.0/10 | 7.3/10 | 8.0/10 |
| Market value | $18.01B | $236.22B | $35.31B | $9.69B | |
| Revenue | $6.50B | $67.53B | $21.11B | $30.9M | |
| Profit | $729.2M | $10.59B | $2.23B | -$71.5M | |
| Revenue growthChange in sales versus the prior year. | 3.7% | 7.6% | 7.0% | 34.6% | 7.6% |
| Gross marginShare of sales left after the direct cost of producing them. | 68.8% | 58.2% | 33.7% | 62.2% | 58.2% |
| Operating marginShare of sales left after running the business, before interest and tax. | 15.8% | — | 16.1% | -1713.7% | -848.8% |
| Profit marginProfit kept from each dollar of sales. | 11.2% | 15.7% | 10.6% | -231.3% | 10.6% |
| Free cash flow marginCash left after capital spending, as a share of sales. | 18.1% | 17.9% | 12.3% | -760.9% | 12.3% |
| Return on equityProfit against the owners' stake in the company. | 228.0% | 32.4% | 14.9% | -4.2% | 14.9% |
| Return on invested capital (approx.)Operating profit after tax against equity plus debt, less cash. Cash here excludes short-term investments, so this runs low for cash-rich companies. | 48.9% | — | 15.9% | -45.3% | -14.7% |
| P/E ratioPrice paid per dollar of annual profit. | 24.70x | 22.30x | 15.83x | — | 19.07x |
| EV / EBITDA (approx.)Market value plus debt less cash, against operating profit before depreciation. Cash excludes short-term investments, so this runs high for cash-rich companies. | 15.72x | — | 8.63x | — | 8.63x |
| Price to book | 56.30x | 7.24x | 2.35x | 5.74x | 5.74x |
| Debt to equityTotal liabilities compared with owners' stake. | 24.27x | 3.65x | 0.38x | 0.09x | 0.38x |
| Piotroski F-ScoreNine checks of financial strength. Higher is stronger. | 6/9 | 7/9 | 7/9 | 4/8 | 7.0 |
| Bankruptcy riskAltman Z-Score zone. | safe | safe | safe | safe |
How IT compares with the others
- IT's operating margin of 15.8% is higher than the median of the other companies selected (-848.8%).
- Its revenue grew more slowly than the median of the other companies selected: 3.7% against 7.6%.
- It trades at a higher P/E than the median of the other companies selected: 24.7x against 19.1x.
- Its liabilities are higher relative to equity than the median of the other companies selected: 24.3x against 0.4x.
Measured against the other companies entered, from each one's latest annual filing. A difference describes the companies; it does not rank them.