How comparing works here
How do I compare two companies?
Type the tickers into the box above — up to five at once. Every row is read from the companies' own annual filings, so a comparison shows the same measure computed the same way for each of them rather than whatever each company chose to highlight.
Can I compare an ETF with a stock?
Yes, and the table changes to suit. Two funds are compared on cost, income, spread and record, because revenue growth and debt mean nothing for a fund. A fund against a company shows only what both of them have.
Side by side
Compare
Put up to 4 companies, funds, commodities or coins next to each other — health, valuation, growth and performance.
Every row is computed the same way for every column, from each company's own annual filing, so a comparison is not a collection of whichever figures each of them chose to put in a press release. Funds are compared on what a fund is actually judged on: cost, income, spread and record.
Relative performance
Rebased so every symbol starts at 0%
Loading price history…
Side by side
Latest annual figures from each company's filings
| Metric | GLOOGloo Holdings, Inc. | RMNIRimini Street, Inc. | BTBTBit Digital, Inc | LAWCS Disco, Inc. | Median of the restexcluding GLOO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Company | Company | Company | Company | |
| Price | $2.96▼ 0.10 (3.27%) | $4.01▼ 0.08 (1.96%) | $0.8448▼ 0.06 (6.85%) | $5.07▲ 0.14 (2.84%) | |
| Health scoreComposite of profitability, growth, debt and accounting quality. | 4.0/10 | 5.0/10 | 3.3/10 | 3.3/10 | 3.3/10 |
| Market value | $280.1M | $367.3M | $273.9M | $320.7M | |
| Revenue | $94.7M | $421.5M | $113.6M | $156.8M | |
| Profit | -$157.1M | $37.1M | -$80.3M | -$44.4M | |
| Revenue growthChange in sales versus the prior year. | 307.7% | -1.7% | 5.1% | 8.3% | 5.1% |
| Gross marginShare of sales left after the direct cost of producing them. | 24.4% | 60.4% | — | 74.9% | 67.6% |
| Operating marginShare of sales left after running the business, before interest and tax. | -114.3% | 14.2% | -80.9% | -30.7% | -30.7% |
| Profit marginProfit kept from each dollar of sales. | -166.0% | 8.8% | -70.7% | -28.3% | -28.3% |
| Free cash flow marginCash left after capital spending, as a share of sales. | -86.3% | 13.2% | -506.2% | -11.5% | -11.5% |
| Return on equityProfit against the owners' stake in the company. | -116.2% | -137.3% | -11.1% | -34.6% | -34.6% |
| Return on invested capital (approx.)Operating profit after tax against equity plus debt, less cash. Cash here excludes short-term investments, so this runs low for cash-rich companies. | -75.5% | — | -12.0% | -35.1% | -23.5% |
| P/E ratioPrice paid per dollar of annual profit. | — | 9.90x | — | — | 9.90x |
| EV / EBITDA (approx.)Market value plus debt less cash, against operating profit before depreciation. Cash excludes short-term investments, so this runs high for cash-rich companies. | — | 4.93x | — | — | 4.93x |
| Price to book | 2.07x | -13.59x | 0.38x | 2.50x | 0.38x |
| Debt to equityTotal liabilities compared with owners' stake. | 0.78x | -16.65x | 0.43x | 0.36x | 0.36x |
| Piotroski F-ScoreNine checks of financial strength. Higher is stronger. | 5/9 | 7/9 | 1/7 | 4/8 | 4.0 |
| Bankruptcy riskAltman Z-Score zone. | distress | distress | n/a for banks | distress |
How GLOO compares with the others
- GLOO's operating margin of -114.3% is lower than the median of the other companies selected (-30.7%).
- Its revenue grew faster than the median of the other companies selected: 307.7% against 5.1%.
- It has no P/E to set against theirs, because it did not make a profit.
- Its liabilities are higher relative to equity than the median of the other companies selected: 0.8x against 0.4x.
Measured against the other companies entered, from each one's latest annual filing. A difference describes the companies; it does not rank them.