How comparing works here
How do I compare two companies?
Type the tickers into the box above — up to five at once. Every row is read from the companies' own annual filings, so a comparison shows the same measure computed the same way for each of them rather than whatever each company chose to highlight.
Can I compare an ETF with a stock?
Yes, and the table changes to suit. Two funds are compared on cost, income, spread and record, because revenue growth and debt mean nothing for a fund. A fund against a company shows only what both of them have.
Side by side
Compare
Put up to 4 companies, funds, commodities or coins next to each other — health, valuation, growth and performance.
Every row is computed the same way for every column, from each company's own annual filing, so a comparison is not a collection of whichever figures each of them chose to put in a press release. Funds are compared on what a fund is actually judged on: cost, income, spread and record.
Relative performance
Rebased so every symbol starts at 0%
Loading price history…
Side by side
Latest annual figures from each company's filings
| Metric | FRTFEDERAL REALTY INVESTMENT TRUST | SPGSIMON PROPERTY GROUP INC. | OREALTY INCOME CORP | KIMKIMCO REALTY CORP | Median of the restexcluding FRT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Company | Company | Company | Company | |
| Price | $105.77▼ 0.76 (0.71%) | $212.04▲ 6.49 (3.16%) | $57.06▲ 1.71 (3.09%) | $23.59▲ 0.87 (3.83%) | |
| Health scoreComposite of profitability, growth, debt and accounting quality. | 7.3/10 | 7.3/10 | 7.3/10 | 7.3/10 | 7.3/10 |
| Market value | $9.12B | $69.20B | $53.29B | $15.90B | |
| Revenue | $1.28B | $6.36B | $5.75B | $2.14B | |
| Profit | $411.1M | $5.36B | $1.06B | $584.7M | |
| Revenue growthChange in sales versus the prior year. | 6.4% | 6.7% | 9.1% | 5.1% | 6.7% |
| Gross marginShare of sales left after the direct cost of producing them. | — | — | — | — | — |
| Operating marginShare of sales left after running the business, before interest and tax. | 47.1% | 49.9% | — | 36.0% | 43.0% |
| Profit marginProfit kept from each dollar of sales. | 32.1% | 84.3% | 18.4% | 27.3% | 27.3% |
| Free cash flow marginCash left after capital spending, as a share of sales. | — | 50.3% | 67.2% | 51.5% | 51.5% |
| Return on equityProfit against the owners' stake in the company. | 12.7% | 103.0% | 2.7% | 5.6% | 5.6% |
| Return on invested capital (approx.)Operating profit after tax against equity plus debt, less cash. Cash here excludes short-term investments, so this runs low for cash-rich companies. | 5.9% | 7.6% | — | 3.4% | 5.5% |
| P/E ratioPrice paid per dollar of annual profit. | 22.20x | 12.90x | 50.34x | 27.19x | 27.19x |
| EV / EBITDA (approx.)Market value plus debt less cash, against operating profit before depreciation. Cash excludes short-term investments, so this runs high for cash-rich companies. | — | — | — | 16.75x | 16.75x |
| Price to book | 2.81x | 13.29x | 1.35x | 1.53x | 1.53x |
| Debt to equityTotal liabilities compared with owners' stake. | 1.73x | 6.51x | 0.83x | 0.88x | 0.88x |
| Piotroski F-ScoreNine checks of financial strength. Higher is stronger. | 5/7 | 5/7 | 5/6 | 7/7 | 5.0 |
| Bankruptcy riskAltman Z-Score zone. | n/a for banks | n/a for banks | n/a for banks | n/a for banks |
How FRT compares with the others
- FRT's operating margin of 47.1% is higher than the median of the other companies selected (43.0%).
- Its revenue growth of 6.4% is in line with the median of the other companies selected (6.7%).
- It trades at a lower P/E than the median of the other companies selected: 22.2x against 27.2x.
- Its liabilities are higher relative to equity than the median of the other companies selected: 1.7x against 0.9x.
Measured against the other companies entered, from each one's latest annual filing. A difference describes the companies; it does not rank them.