How comparing works here
How do I compare two companies?
Type the tickers into the box above — up to five at once. Every row is read from the companies' own annual filings, so a comparison shows the same measure computed the same way for each of them rather than whatever each company chose to highlight.
Can I compare an ETF with a stock?
Yes, and the table changes to suit. Two funds are compared on cost, income, spread and record, because revenue growth and debt mean nothing for a fund. A fund against a company shows only what both of them have.
Side by side
Compare
Put up to 4 companies, funds, commodities or coins next to each other — health, valuation, growth and performance.
Every row is computed the same way for every column, from each company's own annual filing, so a comparison is not a collection of whichever figures each of them chose to put in a press release. Funds are compared on what a fund is actually judged on: cost, income, spread and record.
Relative performance
Rebased so every symbol starts at 0%
Loading price history…
Side by side
Latest annual figures from each company's filings
| Metric | EPAMEPAM Systems, Inc. | IBMINTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP | CTSHCOGNIZANT TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS CORP | ITGARTNER INC | Median of the restexcluding EPAM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Company | Company | Company | Company | |
| Price | $138.67▲ 4.67 (3.49%) | $252.11▲ 0.65 (0.26%) | $73.72▲ 4.17 (6.00%) | $234.44▲ 14.87 (6.77%) | |
| Health scoreComposite of profitability, growth, debt and accounting quality. | 8.7/10 | 8.0/10 | 9.0/10 | 9.0/10 | 9.0/10 |
| Market value | $7.53B | $236.22B | $35.31B | $18.01B | |
| Revenue | $5.46B | $67.53B | $21.11B | $6.50B | |
| Profit | $377.7M | $10.59B | $2.23B | $729.2M | |
| Revenue growthChange in sales versus the prior year. | 15.4% | 7.6% | 7.0% | 3.7% | 7.0% |
| Gross marginShare of sales left after the direct cost of producing them. | 28.8% | 58.2% | 33.7% | 68.8% | 58.2% |
| Operating marginShare of sales left after running the business, before interest and tax. | 9.5% | — | 16.1% | 15.8% | 15.9% |
| Profit marginProfit kept from each dollar of sales. | 6.9% | 15.7% | 10.6% | 11.2% | 11.2% |
| Free cash flow marginCash left after capital spending, as a share of sales. | 11.2% | 17.9% | 12.3% | 18.1% | 17.9% |
| Return on equityProfit against the owners' stake in the company. | 10.3% | 32.4% | 14.9% | 228.0% | 32.4% |
| Return on invested capital (approx.)Operating profit after tax against equity plus debt, less cash. Cash here excludes short-term investments, so this runs low for cash-rich companies. | 16.1% | — | 15.9% | 48.9% | 32.4% |
| P/E ratioPrice paid per dollar of annual profit. | 19.93x | 22.30x | 15.83x | 24.70x | 22.30x |
| EV / EBITDA (approx.)Market value plus debt less cash, against operating profit before depreciation. Cash excludes short-term investments, so this runs high for cash-rich companies. | 10.91x | — | 8.63x | 15.72x | 12.17x |
| Price to book | 2.05x | 7.24x | 2.35x | 56.30x | 7.24x |
| Debt to equityTotal liabilities compared with owners' stake. | 0.33x | 3.65x | 0.38x | 24.27x | 3.65x |
| Piotroski F-ScoreNine checks of financial strength. Higher is stronger. | 6/9 | 7/9 | 7/9 | 6/9 | 7.0 |
| Bankruptcy riskAltman Z-Score zone. | not reported | safe | safe | safe |
How EPAM compares with the others
- EPAM's operating margin of 9.5% is lower than the median of the other companies selected (15.9%).
- Its revenue grew faster than the median of the other companies selected: 15.4% against 7.0%.
- It trades at a lower P/E than the median of the other companies selected: 19.9x against 22.3x.
- Its liabilities are lower relative to equity than the median of the other companies selected: 0.3x against 3.6x.
Measured against the other companies entered, from each one's latest annual filing. A difference describes the companies; it does not rank them.