How comparing works here
How do I compare two companies?
Type the tickers into the box above — up to five at once. Every row is read from the companies' own annual filings, so a comparison shows the same measure computed the same way for each of them rather than whatever each company chose to highlight.
Can I compare an ETF with a stock?
Yes, and the table changes to suit. Two funds are compared on cost, income, spread and record, because revenue growth and debt mean nothing for a fund. A fund against a company shows only what both of them have.
Side by side
Compare
Put up to 4 companies, funds, commodities or coins next to each other — health, valuation, growth and performance.
Every row is computed the same way for every column, from each company's own annual filing, so a comparison is not a collection of whichever figures each of them chose to put in a press release. Funds are compared on what a fund is actually judged on: cost, income, spread and record.
Relative performance
Rebased so every symbol starts at 0%
Loading price history…
Side by side
Latest annual figures from each company's filings
| Metric | ZSZscaler, Inc. | ORCLORACLE CORP | PANWPalo Alto Networks Inc | CRWDCrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. | Median of the restexcluding ZS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Company | Company | Company | Company | |
| Price | $231.33▲ 16.82 (7.84%) | $125.54▼ 3.59 (2.78%) | $354.92▲ 7.67 (2.21%) | $237.94▼ 1.40 (0.58%) | |
| Health scoreComposite of profitability, growth, debt and accounting quality. | 4.7/10 | 6.0/10 | 8.7/10 | 4.7/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Market value | $37.72B | $361.56B | $289.26B | $243.64B | |
| Revenue | $3.35B | $67.36B | $11.48B | $4.81B | |
| Profit | -$63.2M | $17.09B | $307.0M | -$162.5M | |
| Revenue growthChange in sales versus the prior year. | 25.4% | 17.3% | 24.5% | 21.7% | 21.7% |
| Gross marginShare of sales left after the direct cost of producing them. | 76.8% | — | 70.4% | 74.7% | 72.5% |
| Operating marginShare of sales left after running the business, before interest and tax. | -4.0% | 30.6% | 6.1% | -6.1% | 6.1% |
| Profit marginProfit kept from each dollar of sales. | -1.9% | 25.4% | 2.7% | -3.4% | 2.7% |
| Free cash flow marginCash left after capital spending, as a share of sales. | 25.4% | -35.2% | 35.8% | 27.2% | 27.2% |
| Return on equityProfit against the owners' stake in the company. | -2.4% | 40.2% | 1.1% | -3.7% | 1.1% |
| Return on invested capital (approx.)Operating profit after tax against equity plus debt, less cash. Cash here excludes short-term investments, so this runs low for cash-rich companies. | -6.3% | 88.4% | 1.6% | — | 45.0% |
| P/E ratioPrice paid per dollar of annual profit. | — | 21.16x | 942.21x | — | 481.69x |
| EV / EBITDA (approx.)Market value plus debt less cash, against operating profit before depreciation. Cash excludes short-term investments, so this runs high for cash-rich companies. | — | 11.95x | — | — | 11.95x |
| Price to book | 14.52x | 8.51x | 10.52x | 55.02x | 10.52x |
| Debt to equityTotal liabilities compared with owners' stake. | 2.03x | 5.16x | 0.76x | 1.49x | 1.49x |
| Piotroski F-ScoreNine checks of financial strength. Higher is stronger. | 3/8 | 5/7 | 3/8 | 4/9 | 4.0 |
| Bankruptcy riskAltman Z-Score zone. | grey | distress | safe | grey |
How ZS compares with the others
- ZS's operating margin of -4.0% is lower than the median of the other companies selected (6.1%).
- Its revenue grew faster than the median of the other companies selected: 25.4% against 21.7%.
- It has no P/E to set against theirs, because it did not make a profit.
- Its liabilities are higher relative to equity than the median of the other companies selected: 2.0x against 1.5x.
Measured against the other companies entered, from each one's latest annual filing. A difference describes the companies; it does not rank them.