How comparing works here
How do I compare two companies?
Type the tickers into the box above — up to five at once. Every row is read from the companies' own annual filings, so a comparison shows the same measure computed the same way for each of them rather than whatever each company chose to highlight.
Can I compare an ETF with a stock?
Yes, and the table changes to suit. Two funds are compared on cost, income, spread and record, because revenue growth and debt mean nothing for a fund. A fund against a company shows only what both of them have.
Side by side
Compare
Put up to 4 companies, funds, commodities or coins next to each other — health, valuation, growth and performance.
Every row is computed the same way for every column, from each company's own annual filing, so a comparison is not a collection of whichever figures each of them chose to put in a press release. Funds are compared on what a fund is actually judged on: cost, income, spread and record.
Relative performance
Rebased so every symbol starts at 0%
Loading price history…
Side by side
Latest annual figures from each company's filings
| Metric | WKWORKIVA INC | BRZEBraze, Inc. | RIOTRiot Platforms, Inc. | CCCCCC Intelligent Solutions Holdings Inc. | Median of the restexcluding WK |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Company | Company | Company | Company | |
| Price | $80.31▲ 1.05 (1.32%) | $45.68▲ 0.11 (0.24%) | $12.89▼ 1.13 (8.06%) | $7.64▲ 0.01 (0.13%) | |
| Health scoreComposite of profitability, growth, debt and accounting quality. | 4.7/10 | 4.7/10 | 6.0/10 | 6.0/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Market value | $4.52B | $5.18B | $4.79B | $4.63B | |
| Revenue | $884.6M | $738.2M | $647.4M | $1.06B | |
| Profit | -$26.2M | -$131.3M | -$663.2M | $1.7M | |
| Revenue growthChange in sales versus the prior year. | 19.7% | 24.4% | 71.9% | 11.9% | 24.4% |
| Gross marginShare of sales left after the direct cost of producing them. | 78.5% | 67.1% | — | 73.5% | 70.3% |
| Operating marginShare of sales left after running the business, before interest and tax. | -4.8% | -19.6% | -96.1% | 8.9% | -19.6% |
| Profit marginProfit kept from each dollar of sales. | -3.0% | -17.8% | -102.4% | 0.2% | -17.8% |
| Free cash flow marginCash left after capital spending, as a share of sales. | 15.6% | 8.4% | -119.6% | 24.1% | 8.4% |
| Return on equityProfit against the owners' stake in the company. | 481.4% | -21.0% | -23.2% | 0.1% | -21.0% |
| Return on invested capital (approx.)Operating profit after tax against equity plus debt, less cash. Cash here excludes short-term investments, so this runs low for cash-rich companies. | — | -22.9% | -14.2% | 2.5% | -14.2% |
| P/E ratioPrice paid per dollar of annual profit. | — | — | — | 2740.30x | 2740.30x |
| EV / EBITDA (approx.)Market value plus debt less cash, against operating profit before depreciation. Cash excludes short-term investments, so this runs high for cash-rich companies. | — | — | — | 37.95x | 37.95x |
| Price to book | -831.36x | 8.31x | 1.68x | 2.59x | 2.59x |
| Debt to equityTotal liabilities compared with owners' stake. | -275.76x | 0.78x | 0.38x | 1.00x | 0.78x |
| Piotroski F-ScoreNine checks of financial strength. Higher is stronger. | 6/8 | 2/8 | 2/8 | 4/9 | 2.0 |
| Bankruptcy riskAltman Z-Score zone. | distress | distress | n/a for banks | distress |
How WK compares with the others
- WK's operating margin of -4.8% is higher than the median of the other companies selected (-19.6%).
- Its revenue grew more slowly than the median of the other companies selected: 19.7% against 24.4%.
- It has no P/E to set against theirs, because it did not make a profit.
- Its liabilities are lower relative to equity than the median of the other companies selected: -275.8x against 0.8x.
Measured against the other companies entered, from each one's latest annual filing. A difference describes the companies; it does not rank them.