How comparing works here
How do I compare two companies?
Type the tickers into the box above — up to five at once. Every row is read from the companies' own annual filings, so a comparison shows the same measure computed the same way for each of them rather than whatever each company chose to highlight.
Can I compare an ETF with a stock?
Yes, and the table changes to suit. Two funds are compared on cost, income, spread and record, because revenue growth and debt mean nothing for a fund. A fund against a company shows only what both of them have.
Side by side
Compare
Put up to 4 companies, funds, commodities or coins next to each other — health, valuation, growth and performance.
Every row is computed the same way for every column, from each company's own annual filing, so a comparison is not a collection of whichever figures each of them chose to put in a press release. Funds are compared on what a fund is actually judged on: cost, income, spread and record.
Relative performance
Rebased so every symbol starts at 0%
Loading price history…
Side by side
Latest annual figures from each company's filings
| Metric | WHRWHIRLPOOL CORP /DE/ | SNSharkNinja, Inc. | CRCTCricut, Inc. | MCCKMestek Inc | Median of the restexcluding WHR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Company | Company | Company | — | |
| Price | $26.53▼ 1.51 (5.39%) | $197.58▼ 1.14 (0.57%) | $6.33▼ 0.15 (2.31%) | $65.00▲ 3.00 (4.84%) | |
| Health scoreComposite of profitability, growth, debt and accounting quality. | 5.0/10 | 9.0/10 | 7.3/10 | not reported | 8.2/10 |
| Market value | $1.49B | $27.89B | $1.34B | $490.8M | |
| Revenue | $15.52B | $6.40B | $708.8M | — | |
| Profit | $318.0M | $701.4M | $76.7M | — | |
| Revenue growthChange in sales versus the prior year. | -6.5% | 15.7% | -0.5% | — | 7.6% |
| Gross marginShare of sales left after the direct cost of producing them. | 15.4% | 49.0% | 55.1% | — | 52.0% |
| Operating marginShare of sales left after running the business, before interest and tax. | 5.4% | 14.4% | 13.5% | — | 14.0% |
| Profit marginProfit kept from each dollar of sales. | 2.0% | 11.0% | 10.8% | — | 10.9% |
| Free cash flow marginCash left after capital spending, as a share of sales. | 0.5% | 7.6% | — | — | 7.6% |
| Return on equityProfit against the owners' stake in the company. | 11.7% | 26.2% | 22.3% | — | 24.3% |
| Return on invested capital (approx.)Operating profit after tax against equity plus debt, less cash. Cash here excludes short-term investments, so this runs low for cash-rich companies. | 6.3% | 27.2% | 78.2% | — | 52.7% |
| P/E ratioPrice paid per dollar of annual profit. | 4.67x | 39.76x | 17.44x | — | 28.60x |
| EV / EBITDA (approx.)Market value plus debt less cash, against operating profit before depreciation. Cash excludes short-term investments, so this runs high for cash-rich companies. | 5.94x | 26.27x | — | — | 26.27x |
| Price to book | 0.55x | 10.42x | 3.89x | — | 7.16x |
| Debt to equityTotal liabilities compared with owners' stake. | 4.87x | 1.00x | 0.69x | — | 0.84x |
| Piotroski F-ScoreNine checks of financial strength. Higher is stronger. | 6/9 | 7/9 | 7/8 | not reported | 7.0 |
| Bankruptcy riskAltman Z-Score zone. | distress | safe | safe | not reported |
How WHR compares with the others
- WHR's operating margin of 5.4% is lower than the median of the other companies selected (14.0%).
- Its revenue grew more slowly than the median of the other companies selected: -6.5% against 7.6%.
- It trades at a lower P/E than the median of the other companies selected: 4.7x against 28.6x.
- Its liabilities are higher relative to equity than the median of the other companies selected: 4.9x against 0.8x.
Measured against the other companies entered, from each one's latest annual filing. A difference describes the companies; it does not rank them.