How comparing works here
How do I compare two companies?
Type the tickers into the box above — up to five at once. Every row is read from the companies' own annual filings, so a comparison shows the same measure computed the same way for each of them rather than whatever each company chose to highlight.
Can I compare an ETF with a stock?
Yes, and the table changes to suit. Two funds are compared on cost, income, spread and record, because revenue growth and debt mean nothing for a fund. A fund against a company shows only what both of them have.
Side by side
Compare
Put up to 4 companies, funds, commodities or coins next to each other — health, valuation, growth and performance.
Every row is computed the same way for every column, from each company's own annual filing, so a comparison is not a collection of whichever figures each of them chose to put in a press release. Funds are compared on what a fund is actually judged on: cost, income, spread and record.
Relative performance
Rebased so every symbol starts at 0%
Loading price history…
Side by side
Latest annual figures from each company's filings
| Metric | SLNHSoluna Holdings, Inc | ZPTAZapata Quantum, Inc. | EXODExodus Movement, Inc. | TONXTON Strategy Co | Median of the restexcluding SLNH |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Company | Company | Company | Company | |
| Price | $0.534▼ 0.03 (4.64%) | $0.72▼ 0.02 (2.70%) | $5.37▼ 0.09 (1.65%) | $2.96▼ 0.15 (4.82%) | |
| Health scoreComposite of profitability, growth, debt and accounting quality. | 2.0/10 | 6.0/10 | 4.7/10 | 4.7/10 | 4.7/10 |
| Market value | $54.8M | $124.1M | $162.2M | $167.3M | |
| Revenue | $29.7M | — | $121.6M | $12.8M | |
| Profit | -$53.4M | $9.3M | -$11.4M | -$148.5M | |
| Revenue growthChange in sales versus the prior year. | -21.8% | — | 4.5% | 1327.8% | 666.2% |
| Gross marginShare of sales left after the direct cost of producing them. | 6.1% | — | — | 69.5% | 69.5% |
| Operating marginShare of sales left after running the business, before interest and tax. | -113.3% | — | — | -285.2% | -285.2% |
| Profit marginProfit kept from each dollar of sales. | -179.7% | — | -9.3% | -1161.9% | -585.6% |
| Free cash flow marginCash left after capital spending, as a share of sales. | -125.2% | — | -21.2% | -163.2% | -92.2% |
| Return on equityProfit against the owners' stake in the company. | -99.7% | -112.9% | -4.6% | -36.5% | -36.5% |
| Return on invested capital (approx.)Operating profit after tax against equity plus debt, less cash. Cash here excludes short-term investments, so this runs low for cash-rich companies. | -33.1% | — | — | -7.8% | -7.8% |
| P/E ratioPrice paid per dollar of annual profit. | — | 13.29x | — | — | 13.29x |
| EV / EBITDA (approx.)Market value plus debt less cash, against operating profit before depreciation. Cash excludes short-term investments, so this runs high for cash-rich companies. | — | — | — | — | — |
| Price to book | 1.02x | -15.01x | 0.66x | 0.41x | 0.41x |
| Debt to equityTotal liabilities compared with owners' stake. | 1.41x | -1.27x | 0.08x | 0.01x | 0.01x |
| Piotroski F-ScoreNine checks of financial strength. Higher is stronger. | 4/9 | 3/6 | 2/6 | 2/8 | 2.0 |
| Bankruptcy riskAltman Z-Score zone. | n/a for banks | distress | n/a for banks | n/a for banks |
How SLNH compares with the others
- SLNH's operating margin of -113.3% is higher than the other company selected (-285.2%).
- Its revenue grew more slowly than the median of the other companies selected: -21.8% against 666.2%.
- It has no P/E to set against theirs, because it did not make a profit.
- Its liabilities are higher relative to equity than the median of the other companies selected: 1.4x against 0.0x.
Measured against the other companies entered, from each one's latest annual filing. A difference describes the companies; it does not rank them.