How comparing works here
How do I compare two companies?
Type the tickers into the box above — up to five at once. Every row is read from the companies' own annual filings, so a comparison shows the same measure computed the same way for each of them rather than whatever each company chose to highlight.
Can I compare an ETF with a stock?
Yes, and the table changes to suit. Two funds are compared on cost, income, spread and record, because revenue growth and debt mean nothing for a fund. A fund against a company shows only what both of them have.
Side by side
Compare
Put up to 4 companies, funds, commodities or coins next to each other — health, valuation, growth and performance.
Every row is computed the same way for every column, from each company's own annual filing, so a comparison is not a collection of whichever figures each of them chose to put in a press release. Funds are compared on what a fund is actually judged on: cost, income, spread and record.
Relative performance
Rebased so every symbol starts at 0%
Loading price history…
Side by side
Latest annual figures from each company's filings
| Metric | QMLSQumulusAI, Inc. | HUCKHuckleberry.ai, Inc. | EGANEGAIN Corp | SLNHSoluna Holdings, Inc | Median of the restexcluding QMLS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Company | Company | Company | Company | |
| Price | $3.20▼ 0.21 (6.16%) | $3.10▲ 0.03 (0.81%) | $5.67▼ 0.01 (0.18%) | $0.534▼ 0.03 (4.64%) | |
| Health scoreComposite of profitability, growth, debt and accounting quality. | 5.0/10 | 5.0/10 | 4.7/10 | 2.0/10 | 4.7/10 |
| Market value | $100.9M | $127.1M | $148.4M | $54.8M | |
| Revenue | $13.2M | $318.9M | $91.1M | $29.7M | |
| Profit | -$5.4M | -$59.3M | $8.9M | -$53.4M | |
| Revenue growthChange in sales versus the prior year. | 62.5% | 0.6% | 3.1% | -21.8% | 0.6% |
| Gross marginShare of sales left after the direct cost of producing them. | 49.1% | 75.0% | 73.4% | 6.1% | 73.4% |
| Operating marginShare of sales left after running the business, before interest and tax. | -85.3% | -12.3% | 8.7% | -113.3% | -12.3% |
| Profit marginProfit kept from each dollar of sales. | -41.2% | -18.6% | 9.7% | -179.7% | -18.6% |
| Free cash flow marginCash left after capital spending, as a share of sales. | -154.0% | -0.6% | 22.5% | -125.2% | -0.6% |
| Return on equityProfit against the owners' stake in the company. | -8.7% | 31.9% | 10.5% | -99.7% | 10.5% |
| Return on invested capital (approx.)Operating profit after tax against equity plus debt, less cash. Cash here excludes short-term investments, so this runs low for cash-rich companies. | -14.2% | — | 60.2% | -33.1% | 13.5% |
| P/E ratioPrice paid per dollar of annual profit. | — | — | 16.72x | — | 16.72x |
| EV / EBITDA (approx.)Market value plus debt less cash, against operating profit before depreciation. Cash excludes short-term investments, so this runs high for cash-rich companies. | — | — | — | — | — |
| Price to book | 1.62x | -0.68x | 1.76x | 1.02x | 1.02x |
| Debt to equityTotal liabilities compared with owners' stake. | 0.43x | -2.27x | 0.76x | 1.41x | 0.76x |
| Piotroski F-ScoreNine checks of financial strength. Higher is stronger. | 5/9 | 6/9 | 7/8 | 4/9 | 6.0 |
| Bankruptcy riskAltman Z-Score zone. | distress | distress | distress | n/a for banks |
How QMLS compares with the others
- QMLS's operating margin of -85.3% is lower than the median of the other companies selected (-12.3%).
- Its revenue grew faster than the median of the other companies selected: 62.5% against 0.6%.
- It has no P/E to set against theirs, because it did not make a profit.
- Its liabilities are lower relative to equity than the median of the other companies selected: 0.4x against 0.8x.
Measured against the other companies entered, from each one's latest annual filing. A difference describes the companies; it does not rank them.