How comparing works here
How do I compare two companies?
Type the tickers into the box above — up to five at once. Every row is read from the companies' own annual filings, so a comparison shows the same measure computed the same way for each of them rather than whatever each company chose to highlight.
Can I compare an ETF with a stock?
Yes, and the table changes to suit. Two funds are compared on cost, income, spread and record, because revenue growth and debt mean nothing for a fund. A fund against a company shows only what both of them have.
Side by side
Compare
Put up to 4 companies, funds, commodities or coins next to each other — health, valuation, growth and performance.
Every row is computed the same way for every column, from each company's own annual filing, so a comparison is not a collection of whichever figures each of them chose to put in a press release. Funds are compared on what a fund is actually judged on: cost, income, spread and record.
Relative performance
Rebased so every symbol starts at 0%
Loading price history…
Side by side
Latest annual figures from each company's filings
| Metric | OOMAOOMA INC | YEXTYext, Inc. | CCSIConsensus Cloud Solutions, Inc. | WEAVWeave Communications, Inc. | Median of the restexcluding OOMA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Company | Company | Company | Company | |
| Price | $19.77▲ 0.08 (0.41%) | $7.35▲ 0.01 (0.14%) | $37.47▲ 0.45 (1.22%) | $7.40▲ 0.01 (0.14%) | |
| Health scoreComposite of profitability, growth, debt and accounting quality. | 6.0/10 | 6.0/10 | 7.0/10 | 4.7/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Market value | $541.7M | $903.6M | $710.4M | $579.8M | |
| Revenue | $273.6M | $446.6M | $349.7M | $239.0M | |
| Profit | $6.5M | $37.9M | $84.5M | -$28.1M | |
| Revenue growthChange in sales versus the prior year. | 6.5% | 6.1% | -0.2% | 17.0% | 6.1% |
| Gross marginShare of sales left after the direct cost of producing them. | 61.1% | 74.5% | 79.8% | 72.1% | 74.5% |
| Operating marginShare of sales left after running the business, before interest and tax. | 1.6% | 10.0% | 43.0% | -12.8% | 10.0% |
| Profit marginProfit kept from each dollar of sales. | 2.4% | 8.5% | 24.2% | -11.7% | 8.5% |
| Free cash flow marginCash left after capital spending, as a share of sales. | 8.1% | 11.9% | 30.3% | 6.3% | 11.9% |
| Return on equityProfit against the owners' stake in the company. | 7.0% | 23.8% | 613.7% | -34.1% | 23.8% |
| Return on invested capital (approx.)Operating profit after tax against equity plus debt, less cash. Cash here excludes short-term investments, so this runs low for cash-rich companies. | 2.6% | 40.7% | 22.4% | -88.2% | 22.4% |
| P/E ratioPrice paid per dollar of annual profit. | 83.87x | 23.86x | 8.40x | — | 16.13x |
| EV / EBITDA (approx.)Market value plus debt less cash, against operating profit before depreciation. Cash excludes short-term investments, so this runs high for cash-rich companies. | 66.98x | 15.34x | 7.07x | — | 11.20x |
| Price to book | 5.83x | 5.67x | 51.58x | 7.04x | 7.04x |
| Debt to equityTotal liabilities compared with owners' stake. | 1.45x | 2.90x | 47.20x | 1.52x | 2.90x |
| Piotroski F-ScoreNine checks of financial strength. Higher is stronger. | 6/9 | 7/9 | 6/9 | 5/8 | 6.0 |
| Bankruptcy riskAltman Z-Score zone. | distress | distress | grey | distress |
How OOMA compares with the others
- OOMA's operating margin of 1.6% is lower than the median of the other companies selected (10.0%).
- Its revenue growth of 6.5% is in line with the median of the other companies selected (6.1%).
- It trades at a higher P/E than the median of the other companies selected: 83.9x against 16.1x.
- Its liabilities are lower relative to equity than the median of the other companies selected: 1.4x against 2.9x.
Measured against the other companies entered, from each one's latest annual filing. A difference describes the companies; it does not rank them.