How comparing works here
How do I compare two companies?
Type the tickers into the box above — up to five at once. Every row is read from the companies' own annual filings, so a comparison shows the same measure computed the same way for each of them rather than whatever each company chose to highlight.
Can I compare an ETF with a stock?
Yes, and the table changes to suit. Two funds are compared on cost, income, spread and record, because revenue growth and debt mean nothing for a fund. A fund against a company shows only what both of them have.
Side by side
Compare
Put up to 4 companies, funds, commodities or coins next to each other — health, valuation, growth and performance.
Every row is computed the same way for every column, from each company's own annual filing, so a comparison is not a collection of whichever figures each of them chose to put in a press release. Funds are compared on what a fund is actually judged on: cost, income, spread and record.
Relative performance
Rebased so every symbol starts at 0%
Loading price history…
Side by side
Latest annual figures from each company's filings
| Metric | MFImF International Ltd | 8540.HK8540.HK | 8098.HK8098.HK | 993.HK993.HK | Median of the restexcluding MFI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Status | OK | OK | OK | Not found. Check the ticker, or it may not be covered by the configured data sources. | |
| Type | Company | Company | Company | — | |
| Price | $8.41▲ 0.01 (0.12%) | HK$4.38▲ 0.00 (0.11%) | HK$0.38▼ 0.01 (2.56%) | not reported | |
| Health scoreComposite of profitability, growth, debt and accounting quality. | 6.0/10 | 8.7/10 | 6.0/10 | not reported | 7.3/10 |
| Market value | $53.6M | $931.0M | $836.0M | — | |
| Revenue | $4.3M | $151.5M | $44.0M | — | |
| Profit | $10.1M | $60.4M | -$23.1M | — | |
| Revenue growthChange in sales versus the prior year. | 29.4% | 143.9% | 9.6% | — | 76.8% |
| Gross marginShare of sales left after the direct cost of producing them. | 29.6% | — | — | — | — |
| Operating marginShare of sales left after running the business, before interest and tax. | -143.7% | — | 40.4% | — | 40.4% |
| Profit marginProfit kept from each dollar of sales. | 232.8% | 39.8% | -52.6% | — | -6.4% |
| Free cash flow marginCash left after capital spending, as a share of sales. | -47.4% | 94.7% | 41.5% | — | 68.1% |
| Return on equityProfit against the owners' stake in the company. | 2.0% | 25.2% | -14.5% | — | 5.4% |
| Return on invested capital (approx.)Operating profit after tax against equity plus debt, less cash. Cash here excludes short-term investments, so this runs low for cash-rich companies. | -1.0% | — | 9.4% | — | 9.4% |
| P/E ratioPrice paid per dollar of annual profit. | 5.30x | 15.42x | — | — | 15.42x |
| EV / EBITDA (approx.)Market value plus debt less cash, against operating profit before depreciation. Cash excludes short-term investments, so this runs high for cash-rich companies. | — | — | 42.26x | — | 42.26x |
| Price to book | 0.10x | 3.89x | 5.24x | — | 4.57x |
| Debt to equityTotal liabilities compared with owners' stake. | 0.01x | 1.16x | 0.31x | — | 0.74x |
| Piotroski F-ScoreNine checks of financial strength. Higher is stronger. | 4/9 | 5/6 | 5/7 | not reported | 5.0 |
| Bankruptcy riskAltman Z-Score zone. | safe | not reported | safe | not reported |
How MFI compares with the others
- MFI's operating margin of -143.7% is lower than the other company selected (40.4%).
- Its revenue grew more slowly than the median of the other companies selected: 29.4% against 76.8%.
- It trades at a lower P/E than the other company selected: 5.3x against 15.4x.
- Its liabilities are lower relative to equity than the median of the other companies selected: 0.0x against 0.7x.
Measured against the other companies entered, from each one's latest annual filing. A difference describes the companies; it does not rank them.