How comparing works here
How do I compare two companies?
Type the tickers into the box above — up to five at once. Every row is read from the companies' own annual filings, so a comparison shows the same measure computed the same way for each of them rather than whatever each company chose to highlight.
Can I compare an ETF with a stock?
Yes, and the table changes to suit. Two funds are compared on cost, income, spread and record, because revenue growth and debt mean nothing for a fund. A fund against a company shows only what both of them have.
Side by side
Compare
Put up to 4 companies, funds, commodities or coins next to each other — health, valuation, growth and performance.
Every row is computed the same way for every column, from each company's own annual filing, so a comparison is not a collection of whichever figures each of them chose to put in a press release. Funds are compared on what a fund is actually judged on: cost, income, spread and record.
Relative performance
Rebased so every symbol starts at 0%
Loading price history…
Side by side
Latest annual figures from each company's filings
| Metric | MATVMativ Holdings, Inc. | HWKNHAWKINS INC | OLNOLIN Corp | KROKRONOS WORLDWIDE INC | Median of the restexcluding MATV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Company | Company | Company | Company | |
| Price | $12.25▲ 0.51 (4.34%) | $133.17▲ 2.87 (2.20%) | $15.54▲ 0.61 (4.09%) | $7.64▲ 0.16 (2.14%) | |
| Health scoreComposite of profitability, growth, debt and accounting quality. | 5.0/10 | 8.0/10 | 3.3/10 | 2.0/10 | 3.3/10 |
| Market value | $669.8M | $2.76B | $1.77B | $878.6M | |
| Revenue | $1.99B | $1.08B | $6.78B | $1.86B | |
| Profit | -$337.4M | $81.5M | -$101.1M | -$110.9M | |
| Revenue growthChange in sales versus the prior year. | 0.3% | 11.2% | 3.7% | -1.5% | 3.7% |
| Gross marginShare of sales left after the direct cost of producing them. | 18.3% | 22.6% | 7.4% | 11.5% | 11.5% |
| Operating marginShare of sales left after running the business, before interest and tax. | -19.3% | 11.2% | 0.1% | -2.0% | 0.1% |
| Profit marginProfit kept from each dollar of sales. | -17.0% | 7.5% | -1.5% | -6.0% | -1.5% |
| Free cash flow marginCash left after capital spending, as a share of sales. | 4.7% | 7.9% | 3.7% | -2.2% | 3.7% |
| Return on equityProfit against the owners' stake in the company. | -67.7% | 15.3% | -5.5% | -14.8% | -5.5% |
| Return on invested capital (approx.)Operating profit after tax against equity plus debt, less cash. Cash here excludes short-term investments, so this runs low for cash-rich companies. | -21.2% | 11.7% | 0.1% | -2.3% | 0.1% |
| P/E ratioPrice paid per dollar of annual profit. | — | 33.89x | — | — | 33.89x |
| EV / EBITDA (approx.)Market value plus debt less cash, against operating profit before depreciation. Cash excludes short-term investments, so this runs high for cash-rich companies. | — | 17.28x | 8.40x | 58.45x | 17.28x |
| Price to book | 1.34x | 5.18x | 0.96x | 1.17x | 1.17x |
| Debt to equityTotal liabilities compared with owners' stake. | 3.11x | 0.85x | 2.97x | 1.42x | 1.42x |
| Piotroski F-ScoreNine checks of financial strength. Higher is stronger. | 4/9 | 4/9 | 4/9 | 5/9 | 4.0 |
| Bankruptcy riskAltman Z-Score zone. | distress | safe | distress | distress |
How MATV compares with the others
- MATV's operating margin of -19.3% is lower than the median of the other companies selected (0.1%).
- Its revenue grew more slowly than the median of the other companies selected: 0.3% against 3.7%.
- It has no P/E to set against theirs, because it did not make a profit.
- Its liabilities are higher relative to equity than the median of the other companies selected: 3.1x against 1.4x.
Measured against the other companies entered, from each one's latest annual filing. A difference describes the companies; it does not rank them.