How comparing works here
How do I compare two companies?
Type the tickers into the box above — up to five at once. Every row is read from the companies' own annual filings, so a comparison shows the same measure computed the same way for each of them rather than whatever each company chose to highlight.
Can I compare an ETF with a stock?
Yes, and the table changes to suit. Two funds are compared on cost, income, spread and record, because revenue growth and debt mean nothing for a fund. A fund against a company shows only what both of them have.
Side by side
Compare
Put up to 4 companies, funds, commodities or coins next to each other — health, valuation, growth and performance.
Every row is computed the same way for every column, from each company's own annual filing, so a comparison is not a collection of whichever figures each of them chose to put in a press release. Funds are compared on what a fund is actually judged on: cost, income, spread and record.
Relative performance
Rebased so every symbol starts at 0%
Loading price history…
Side by side
Latest annual figures from each company's filings
| Metric | MAPSWM TECHNOLOGY, INC. | BTCSBTCS Inc. | DTCXDatacentrex, Inc. | KNITKinetic Group Inc | Median of the restexcluding MAPS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Company | Company | Company | Company | |
| Price | $0.297▼ 0.00 (0.97%) | $1.11▲ 0.02 (1.83%) | $1.16▼ 0.17 (12.78%) | $2.00▲ 0.00 (0.00%) | |
| Health scoreComposite of profitability, growth, debt and accounting quality. | 6.0/10 | 6.0/10 | 7.3/10 | 2.0/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Market value | $31.7M | $52.0M | $35.2M | $52.8M | |
| Revenue | $174.7M | $16.5M | $7.0M | $0.00 | |
| Profit | $2.0M | -$33.4M | -$8.5M | -$95.1K | |
| Revenue growthChange in sales versus the prior year. | -5.3% | 304.8% | 939640.5% | — | 469972.7% |
| Gross marginShare of sales left after the direct cost of producing them. | 94.9% | 12.2% | 48.9% | — | 30.5% |
| Operating marginShare of sales left after running the business, before interest and tax. | 0.4% | — | -113.7% | — | -113.7% |
| Profit marginProfit kept from each dollar of sales. | 1.1% | -202.2% | -122.1% | — | -162.2% |
| Free cash flow marginCash left after capital spending, as a share of sales. | 7.7% | -59.4% | -465.1% | — | -262.2% |
| Return on equityProfit against the owners' stake in the company. | 3.4% | -23.9% | -12.8% | 38.8% | -12.8% |
| Return on invested capital (approx.)Operating profit after tax against equity plus debt, less cash. Cash here excludes short-term investments, so this runs low for cash-rich companies. | — | — | -22.9% | — | -22.9% |
| P/E ratioPrice paid per dollar of annual profit. | 16.13x | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA (approx.)Market value plus debt less cash, against operating profit before depreciation. Cash excludes short-term investments, so this runs high for cash-rich companies. | — | — | — | — | — |
| Price to book | 0.55x | 0.37x | 0.53x | -215.70x | 0.37x |
| Debt to equityTotal liabilities compared with owners' stake. | 1.03x | 0.54x | 0.01x | -1.00x | 0.01x |
| Piotroski F-ScoreNine checks of financial strength. Higher is stronger. | 4/8 | 1/8 | 3/7 | 3/7 | 3.0 |
| Bankruptcy riskAltman Z-Score zone. | grey | n/a for banks | safe | distress |
How MAPS compares with the others
- MAPS's operating margin of 0.4% is higher than the other company selected (-113.7%).
- Its revenue grew more slowly than the median of the other companies selected: -5.3% against 469972.7%.
- Its liabilities are higher relative to equity than the median of the other companies selected: 1.0x against 0.0x.
Measured against the other companies entered, from each one's latest annual filing. A difference describes the companies; it does not rank them.