How comparing works here
How do I compare two companies?
Type the tickers into the box above — up to five at once. Every row is read from the companies' own annual filings, so a comparison shows the same measure computed the same way for each of them rather than whatever each company chose to highlight.
Can I compare an ETF with a stock?
Yes, and the table changes to suit. Two funds are compared on cost, income, spread and record, because revenue growth and debt mean nothing for a fund. A fund against a company shows only what both of them have.
Side by side
Compare
Put up to 4 companies, funds, commodities or coins next to each other — health, valuation, growth and performance.
Every row is computed the same way for every column, from each company's own annual filing, so a comparison is not a collection of whichever figures each of them chose to put in a press release. Funds are compared on what a fund is actually judged on: cost, income, spread and record.
Relative performance
Rebased so every symbol starts at 0%
Loading price history…
Side by side
Latest annual figures from each company's filings
| Metric | HUTHut 8 Corp. | IDCCInterDigital, Inc. | ZETAZeta Global Holdings Corp. | TTANServiceTitan, Inc. | Median of the restexcluding HUT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Company | Company | Company | Company | |
| Price | $71.58▲ 2.54 (3.68%) | $332.06▼ 2.62 (0.78%) | $33.52▼ 0.59 (1.73%) | $86.30▲ 1.10 (1.29%) | |
| Health scoreComposite of profitability, growth, debt and accounting quality. | 4.7/10 | 6.0/10 | 4.7/10 | 6.0/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Market value | $7.88B | $8.53B | $7.40B | $7.97B | |
| Revenue | $235.1M | $834.0M | $1.30B | $961.0M | |
| Profit | -$226.1M | $406.6M | -$31.5M | -$159.9M | |
| Revenue growthChange in sales versus the prior year. | 44.8% | -4.0% | 29.7% | 24.5% | 24.5% |
| Gross marginShare of sales left after the direct cost of producing them. | 54.2% | — | 60.6% | 70.1% | 65.4% |
| Operating marginShare of sales left after running the business, before interest and tax. | -136.9% | 55.3% | 0.4% | -17.6% | 0.4% |
| Profit marginProfit kept from each dollar of sales. | -96.2% | 48.8% | -2.4% | -16.6% | -2.4% |
| Free cash flow marginCash left after capital spending, as a share of sales. | — | 63.4% | 14.2% | 11.0% | 14.2% |
| Return on equityProfit against the owners' stake in the company. | -15.9% | 36.9% | -3.9% | -10.5% | -3.9% |
| Return on invested capital (approx.)Operating profit after tax against equity plus debt, less cash. Cash here excludes short-term investments, so this runs low for cash-rich companies. | -18.5% | 47.7% | 0.6% | -12.2% | 0.6% |
| P/E ratioPrice paid per dollar of annual profit. | — | 20.97x | — | — | 20.97x |
| EV / EBITDA (approx.)Market value plus debt less cash, against operating profit before depreciation. Cash excludes short-term investments, so this runs high for cash-rich companies. | — | 15.35x | 707.71x | — | 361.53x |
| Price to book | 5.54x | 7.75x | 9.20x | 5.23x | 7.75x |
| Debt to equityTotal liabilities compared with owners' stake. | 0.75x | 0.87x | 0.87x | 0.14x | 0.87x |
| Piotroski F-ScoreNine checks of financial strength. Higher is stronger. | 2/8 | 7/8 | 5/9 | 6/9 | 6.0 |
| Bankruptcy riskAltman Z-Score zone. | n/a for banks | n/a for banks | distress | safe |
How HUT compares with the others
- HUT's operating margin of -136.9% is lower than the median of the other companies selected (0.4%).
- Its revenue grew faster than the median of the other companies selected: 44.8% against 24.5%.
- It has no P/E to set against theirs, because it did not make a profit.
- Its liabilities are lower relative to equity than the median of the other companies selected: 0.7x against 0.9x.
Measured against the other companies entered, from each one's latest annual filing. A difference describes the companies; it does not rank them.