How comparing works here
How do I compare two companies?
Type the tickers into the box above — up to five at once. Every row is read from the companies' own annual filings, so a comparison shows the same measure computed the same way for each of them rather than whatever each company chose to highlight.
Can I compare an ETF with a stock?
Yes, and the table changes to suit. Two funds are compared on cost, income, spread and record, because revenue growth and debt mean nothing for a fund. A fund against a company shows only what both of them have.
Side by side
Compare
Put up to 4 companies, funds, commodities or coins next to each other — health, valuation, growth and performance.
Every row is computed the same way for every column, from each company's own annual filing, so a comparison is not a collection of whichever figures each of them chose to put in a press release. Funds are compared on what a fund is actually judged on: cost, income, spread and record.
Relative performance
Rebased so every symbol starts at 0%
Loading price history…
Side by side
Latest annual figures from each company's filings
| Metric | GTXGarrett Motion Inc. | APTVAptiv PLC | VGNTVersigent PLC | AUTN.SWAUTN.SW | Median of the restexcluding GTX |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Company | Company | Company | Company | |
| Price | $22.00▼ 1.93 (8.07%) | $43.81▼ 0.53 (1.20%) | $42.35▼ 1.04 (2.40%) | CHF 120.00▼ 4.40 (3.54%) | |
| Health scoreComposite of profitability, growth, debt and accounting quality. | 7.0/10 | 8.0/10 | 8.0/10 | 7.0/10 | 8.0/10 |
| Market value | $4.19B | $9.32B | $3.01B | $696.6M | |
| Revenue | $3.58B | $20.40B | $8.82B | $2.29B | |
| Profit | $310.0M | $165.0M | $492.0M | $60.0M | |
| Revenue growthChange in sales versus the prior year. | 3.1% | 3.5% | 6.1% | -2.1% | 3.5% |
| Gross marginShare of sales left after the direct cost of producing them. | 20.4% | 19.1% | 12.3% | 55.5% | 19.1% |
| Operating marginShare of sales left after running the business, before interest and tax. | — | 5.8% | 7.5% | 3.2% | 5.8% |
| Profit marginProfit kept from each dollar of sales. | 8.6% | 0.8% | 5.6% | 2.6% | 2.6% |
| Free cash flow marginCash left after capital spending, as a share of sales. | 9.5% | 7.5% | 5.5% | 4.6% | 5.5% |
| Return on equityProfit against the owners' stake in the company. | -38.7% | 1.8% | 29.8% | 11.9% | 11.9% |
| Return on invested capital (approx.)Operating profit after tax against equity plus debt, less cash. Cash here excludes short-term investments, so this runs low for cash-rich companies. | — | 6.3% | 36.2% | 5.9% | 6.3% |
| P/E ratioPrice paid per dollar of annual profit. | 13.52x | 56.49x | 6.12x | 11.61x | 11.61x |
| EV / EBITDA (approx.)Market value plus debt less cash, against operating profit before depreciation. Cash excludes short-term investments, so this runs high for cash-rich companies. | — | 7.64x | 3.15x | 4.34x | 4.34x |
| Price to book | -5.23x | 1.01x | 1.82x | 1.38x | 1.38x |
| Debt to equityTotal liabilities compared with owners' stake. | -3.95x | 1.51x | 1.91x | 2.27x | 1.91x |
| Piotroski F-ScoreNine checks of financial strength. Higher is stronger. | 8/9 | 8/9 | 7/9 | 6/9 | 7.0 |
| Bankruptcy riskAltman Z-Score zone. | not reported | grey | not reported | grey |
How GTX compares with the others
- GTX's profit margin of 8.6% is higher than the median of the other companies selected (2.6%).
- Its revenue growth of 3.1% is in line with the median of the other companies selected (3.5%).
- It trades at a higher P/E than the median of the other companies selected: 13.5x against 11.6x.
- Its liabilities are lower relative to equity than the median of the other companies selected: -4.0x against 1.9x.
Measured against the other companies entered, from each one's latest annual filing. A difference describes the companies; it does not rank them.