How comparing works here
How do I compare two companies?
Type the tickers into the box above — up to five at once. Every row is read from the companies' own annual filings, so a comparison shows the same measure computed the same way for each of them rather than whatever each company chose to highlight.
Can I compare an ETF with a stock?
Yes, and the table changes to suit. Two funds are compared on cost, income, spread and record, because revenue growth and debt mean nothing for a fund. A fund against a company shows only what both of them have.
Side by side
Compare
Put up to 4 companies, funds, commodities or coins next to each other — health, valuation, growth and performance.
Every row is computed the same way for every column, from each company's own annual filing, so a comparison is not a collection of whichever figures each of them chose to put in a press release. Funds are compared on what a fund is actually judged on: cost, income, spread and record.
Relative performance
Rebased so every symbol starts at 0%
Loading price history…
Side by side
Latest annual figures from each company's filings
| Metric | FROGJFrog Ltd | NOWServiceNow, Inc. | FTNTFortinet, Inc. | ZSZscaler, Inc. | Median of the restexcluding FROG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Company | Company | Company | Company | |
| Price | $93.89▼ 2.41 (2.50%) | $157.00▲ 3.88 (2.53%) | $172.98▼ 1.07 (0.61%) | $231.33▲ 16.82 (7.84%) | |
| Health scoreComposite of profitability, growth, debt and accounting quality. | 7.3/10 | 8.7/10 | 9.0/10 | 4.7/10 | 8.7/10 |
| Market value | $11.23B | $164.42B | $128.52B | $37.72B | |
| Revenue | $531.8M | $13.28B | $6.80B | $3.35B | |
| Profit | -$71.8M | $1.75B | $1.85B | -$63.2M | |
| Revenue growthChange in sales versus the prior year. | 24.1% | 20.9% | 14.2% | 25.4% | 20.9% |
| Gross marginShare of sales left after the direct cost of producing them. | 76.8% | 77.5% | 80.5% | 76.8% | 77.5% |
| Operating marginShare of sales left after running the business, before interest and tax. | -17.3% | 13.7% | 30.7% | -4.0% | 13.7% |
| Profit marginProfit kept from each dollar of sales. | -13.5% | 13.2% | 27.3% | -1.9% | 13.2% |
| Free cash flow marginCash left after capital spending, as a share of sales. | 26.8% | 34.5% | 32.7% | 25.4% | 32.7% |
| Return on equityProfit against the owners' stake in the company. | -8.1% | 13.5% | 149.8% | -2.4% | 13.5% |
| Return on invested capital (approx.)Operating profit after tax against equity plus debt, less cash. Cash here excludes short-term investments, so this runs low for cash-rich companies. | -8.9% | 15.3% | — | -6.3% | 4.5% |
| P/E ratioPrice paid per dollar of annual profit. | — | 94.06x | 69.35x | — | 81.70x |
| EV / EBITDA (approx.)Market value plus debt less cash, against operating profit before depreciation. Cash excludes short-term investments, so this runs high for cash-rich companies. | — | — | 56.79x | — | 56.79x |
| Price to book | 12.66x | 12.68x | 103.86x | 14.52x | 14.52x |
| Debt to equityTotal liabilities compared with owners' stake. | 0.51x | 1.01x | 7.40x | 2.03x | 2.03x |
| Piotroski F-ScoreNine checks of financial strength. Higher is stronger. | 4/8 | 5/8 | 7/9 | 3/8 | 5.0 |
| Bankruptcy riskAltman Z-Score zone. | safe | grey | safe | grey |
How FROG compares with the others
- FROG's operating margin of -17.3% is lower than the median of the other companies selected (13.7%).
- Its revenue grew faster than the median of the other companies selected: 24.1% against 20.9%.
- It has no P/E to set against theirs, because it did not make a profit.
- Its liabilities are lower relative to equity than the median of the other companies selected: 0.5x against 2.0x.
Measured against the other companies entered, from each one's latest annual filing. A difference describes the companies; it does not rank them.