How comparing works here
How do I compare two companies?
Type the tickers into the box above — up to five at once. Every row is read from the companies' own annual filings, so a comparison shows the same measure computed the same way for each of them rather than whatever each company chose to highlight.
Can I compare an ETF with a stock?
Yes, and the table changes to suit. Two funds are compared on cost, income, spread and record, because revenue growth and debt mean nothing for a fund. A fund against a company shows only what both of them have.
Side by side
Compare
Put up to 4 companies, funds, commodities or coins next to each other — health, valuation, growth and performance.
Every row is computed the same way for every column, from each company's own annual filing, so a comparison is not a collection of whichever figures each of them chose to put in a press release. Funds are compared on what a fund is actually judged on: cost, income, spread and record.
Relative performance
Rebased so every symbol starts at 0%
Loading price history…
Side by side
Latest annual figures from each company's filings
| Metric | FATNFatpipe Inc/UT | SSTISOUNDTHINKING, INC. | AEYEAUDIOEYE INC | RDZNRoadzen Inc. | Median of the restexcluding FATN |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Company | Company | Company | Company | |
| Price | $5.31▼ 0.03 (0.56%) | $8.36▼ 0.04 (0.48%) | $8.08▼ 0.02 (0.25%) | $1.15▲ 0.09 (8.49%) | |
| Health scoreComposite of profitability, growth, debt and accounting quality. | 7.0/10 | 3.3/10 | 5.0/10 | 4.7/10 | 4.7/10 |
| Market value | $74.5M | $107.2M | $100.1M | $91.7M | |
| Revenue | $19.2M | $104.1M | $40.3M | $55.0M | |
| Profit | $5.0M | -$9.4M | -$3.1M | -$22.5M | |
| Revenue growthChange in sales versus the prior year. | 17.9% | 2.1% | 14.5% | 24.2% | 14.5% |
| Gross marginShare of sales left after the direct cost of producing them. | 91.0% | 54.4% | 78.3% | 61.3% | 61.3% |
| Operating marginShare of sales left after running the business, before interest and tax. | 18.7% | -8.4% | -4.5% | -25.4% | -8.4% |
| Profit marginProfit kept from each dollar of sales. | 25.9% | -9.0% | -7.6% | -40.9% | -9.0% |
| Free cash flow marginCash left after capital spending, as a share of sales. | -4.3% | 4.7% | 11.7% | -38.7% | 4.7% |
| Return on equityProfit against the owners' stake in the company. | 19.7% | -13.1% | -64.1% | 75.9% | -13.1% |
| Return on invested capital (approx.)Operating profit after tax against equity plus debt, less cash. Cash here excludes short-term investments, so this runs low for cash-rich companies. | 11.3% | -12.2% | -11.6% | — | -11.9% |
| P/E ratioPrice paid per dollar of annual profit. | 14.98x | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA (approx.)Market value plus debt less cash, against operating profit before depreciation. Cash excludes short-term investments, so this runs high for cash-rich companies. | 18.76x | — | 62.03x | — | 62.03x |
| Price to book | 2.95x | 1.49x | 20.83x | -3.09x | 1.49x |
| Debt to equityTotal liabilities compared with owners' stake. | 0.37x | 0.88x | 5.71x | -2.67x | 0.88x |
| Piotroski F-ScoreNine checks of financial strength. Higher is stronger. | 4/9 | 5/8 | 5/9 | 4/9 | 5.0 |
| Bankruptcy riskAltman Z-Score zone. | safe | distress | distress | n/a for banks |
How FATN compares with the others
- FATN's operating margin of 18.7% is higher than the median of the other companies selected (-8.4%).
- Its revenue grew faster than the median of the other companies selected: 17.9% against 14.5%.
- Its liabilities are lower relative to equity than the median of the other companies selected: 0.4x against 0.9x.
Measured against the other companies entered, from each one's latest annual filing. A difference describes the companies; it does not rank them.