How comparing works here
How do I compare two companies?
Type the tickers into the box above — up to five at once. Every row is read from the companies' own annual filings, so a comparison shows the same measure computed the same way for each of them rather than whatever each company chose to highlight.
Can I compare an ETF with a stock?
Yes, and the table changes to suit. Two funds are compared on cost, income, spread and record, because revenue growth and debt mean nothing for a fund. A fund against a company shows only what both of them have.
Side by side
Compare
Put up to 4 companies, funds, commodities or coins next to each other — health, valuation, growth and performance.
Every row is computed the same way for every column, from each company's own annual filing, so a comparison is not a collection of whichever figures each of them chose to put in a press release. Funds are compared on what a fund is actually judged on: cost, income, spread and record.
Relative performance
Rebased so every symbol starts at 0%
Loading price history…
Side by side
Latest annual figures from each company's filings
| Metric | AKAMAKAMAI TECHNOLOGIES INC | OKTAOkta, Inc. | CRWVCoreWeave, Inc. | MDBMongoDB, Inc. | Median of the restexcluding AKAM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Company | Company | Company | Company | |
| Price | $91.13▲ 0.86 (0.95%) | $201.33▼ 7.31 (3.50%) | $61.82▼ 0.31 (0.50%) | $390.75▲ 24.57 (6.71%) | |
| Health scoreComposite of profitability, growth, debt and accounting quality. | 7.3/10 | 7.3/10 | 4.0/10 | 4.7/10 | 4.7/10 |
| Market value | $13.19B | $35.41B | $26.89B | $31.40B | |
| Revenue | $4.21B | $2.92B | $5.13B | $2.46B | |
| Profit | $452.0M | $235.0M | -$1.17B | -$71.2M | |
| Revenue growthChange in sales versus the prior year. | 5.4% | 11.8% | 167.9% | 22.8% | 22.8% |
| Gross marginShare of sales left after the direct cost of producing them. | 58.9% | 77.4% | 71.7% | 71.7% | 71.7% |
| Operating marginShare of sales left after running the business, before interest and tax. | 13.5% | 5.1% | -0.9% | -5.6% | -0.9% |
| Profit marginProfit kept from each dollar of sales. | 10.7% | 8.1% | -22.7% | -2.9% | -2.9% |
| Free cash flow marginCash left after capital spending, as a share of sales. | 24.0% | 30.0% | -141.3% | 20.3% | 20.3% |
| Return on equityProfit against the owners' stake in the company. | 9.1% | 3.4% | -35.0% | -2.4% | -2.4% |
| Return on invested capital (approx.)Operating profit after tax against equity plus debt, less cash. Cash here excludes short-term investments, so this runs low for cash-rich companies. | 10.5% | 2.2% | -0.2% | -5.8% | -0.2% |
| P/E ratioPrice paid per dollar of annual profit. | 29.17x | 150.68x | — | — | 150.68x |
| EV / EBITDA (approx.)Market value plus debt less cash, against operating profit before depreciation. Cash excludes short-term investments, so this runs high for cash-rich companies. | — | — | 18.74x | — | 18.74x |
| Price to book | 2.65x | 5.06x | 8.06x | 10.64x | 8.06x |
| Debt to equityTotal liabilities compared with owners' stake. | 1.31x | 0.39x | 13.78x | 0.27x | 0.39x |
| Piotroski F-ScoreNine checks of financial strength. Higher is stronger. | 5/8 | 7/8 | 4/9 | 5/8 | 5.0 |
| Bankruptcy riskAltman Z-Score zone. | safe | safe | distress | safe |
How AKAM compares with the others
- AKAM's operating margin of 13.5% is higher than the median of the other companies selected (-0.9%).
- Its revenue grew more slowly than the median of the other companies selected: 5.4% against 22.8%.
- It trades at a lower P/E than the other company selected: 29.2x against 150.7x.
- Its liabilities are higher relative to equity than the median of the other companies selected: 1.3x against 0.4x.
Measured against the other companies entered, from each one's latest annual filing. A difference describes the companies; it does not rank them.